Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReintam, Endla
dc.contributor.authorSutri, Merit
dc.contributor.authorKahu, Greete
dc.contributor.authorAre, Mihkel
dc.contributor.authorStagerescu, Gheorge
dc.contributor.authorSelge, Are
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T09:53:22Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T09:53:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.publicationAgronoomia 2018 : Agronomy 2018, 2018, 22-29est
dc.identifier.issn1736-6275
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/6394
dc.description.abstractFinding out the best agricultural management practices for certain climatic regions and soils is crucial to maintain soils quality. One of the practices, to stop soil erosion, reduce leaching and increase soil organic carbon content, is no-tillage. No tillage is coming more popular also in Estonia. It helps to reduce fuel and labour costs. However, as there is missing decades long practice of no-tillage in Estonia, its effect on soil quality is not clear. At the same time, easy methods to detect soil quality are needed next to the laboratory analyses. During the project iSQPER the visual assessment tool was developed for easy detection of soil quality. The aim of the current study was to compare visual assessment with laboratory measurements on Estonian no-till fields in the 2016. The study was done on sandy loam Gleyic Stagnic Luvisol in Põlva and sandy loam Stagnic Luvisol in Tartu County. Visual assessment was made from the soil upper 30 cm layer, laboratory measurements from 5–10 cm and 25–30 cm depth. The parameters studied were: erodibility, water logging, soil structure and slaking, colour, porosity, plough pan, organic carbon content, penetration resistance and amount of earthworms. The study revealed slightly better soil quality under no-tillage by visual assessment. In most cases laboratory analyses confirmed these results. Structural distribution was better by ploughing compared with no tillage. However, fine aggregate (0.25–2 mm) stability was higher under no-tillage compared with ploughing. There were no significant differences in number of earthworms between practices.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipUurimistööd on toetanud Euroopa Liidu Horizont 2020 teaduse ja innovatsiooni grant Nr 635750 iSQAPER.est
dc.publisherEesti Maaülikool; Eesti Taimekasvatuse Instituutest
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ; openAccesseng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectvisual assessmenteng
dc.subjectlaboratory measurementseng
dc.subjectno-tillageeng
dc.subjectploughingeng
dc.subjectstructureeng
dc.subjectarticleseng
dc.titleOtsekülvi mõju mulla kvaliteedile Eesti tootmispõldudelest
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.contributor.departmentEesti Maaülikool. Põllumajandus- ja keskkonnainstituut. Mullateaduse õppetoolest
dc.contributor.departmentEesti Maaülikool. Põllumajandus- ja keskkonnainstituut. Taimekasvatuse ja taimebioloogia õppetoolest


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ; openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ; openAccess