Probiootikumid vasikate söödaratsioonides
View/ Open
Date
2012Embargo Lift Date
ainult raamatukogusonly in library
Author
Ojaots, Riho
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Probiootikumide kasutamise traditsioonid on pikad. Probiootikume sisaldavaid fermeteeritud
toiduaineid on inimtoitumisel kasutatud aastasadu, enamus sellest ajast siiski
alateadlikult. Seoses mikrobioloogiateaduse arenguga, alates eelmise sajandi algusest, on
aktiivselt selgitatud probiootikumide toimet nii inimtoitumise, kui loomade toitumise
juures.
Loomakasvatuses on probiootikumide toimet eriti aktiivselt uuritud paar viimast aastakümmet,
kui Euroopa Liidus keelustati antibiootikumide kasutamine noorloomade
kõhulahtisuse preventatiivseks raviks. Täna loomakasvatuses kasutatavad täispiimaasendajad
ja startersöödad sisaldavad enamuses erinevaid probiootikume. Suur osa
probiootilistest bakteritest on isoleeritud noorloomade seedetraktist, kuid uuritud on ka
mitmeid teisi probiootilisi baktereid.
Antud magistritöös uuriti Tervisliku Piima Biotehnoloogiate Arenduskeskuse poolt
registreeritud L. plantarum E-98 tüve, mis on isoleeritud heintaimedelt. Uuriti nimetatud
bakteri koloniseerumist vasikate soolkanalis. Vasikatele joodeti koos täispiimaga
L. plantarum E-98 tüvi alates teisest joogist pärast sündi. Seda joodeti viie päeva jooksul.
Kõikidel jootmise päevadel ja kolm päeva pärast bakteri jootmist võeti vasikate
pärasoolest roojaproovid. Bakterioloogilised uuringud teostati Arenduskeskuse laboris. During the last decade in Estonia, cattle breeding has vigorously been invested in. More
than half of dairy cows are located in modern, new or renovated facilities. Also, the
productivity of cows has grown rapidly. Because of the high cost of milk and dairy
products, the area of the dairy used for feeding calves has significantly been reduced,
moreover, calves are weaned significantly earlier, which is at the age of two months
instead of six months.
Another major change in rearing calves has occurred in the prevention of diarrhoea. In
previous years a variety of antibiotics were used as a preventative measure; however, now
this has now been stopped, in agreement with the European Union. The reason is the
emergence of antibiotic resistance among both animals and humans. Therefore, the use of
antibiotics is accepted merely for medical purposes. One possible measure against
diarrhoea is the use of probiotics at a very early age, as the aim of probiotic bacteria is to
introduce them into the calf’s alimentary canal before pathogenic bacteria are able to
colonize it.
The current research is a part of the Bio-Competence Centre of Healthy Dairy pilot
project, which aims to study the survival of bacteria in the digestive tract of calves.
However, the research is largely a review, based on current scientific literature, since
several of the findings are filed to be patented.
In the present research, a general overview of the history of the use of probiotic bacteria
is given as well as an insight into the probiotic bacteria species commonly used in
livestock farming. A large part of the literature review is based on the results of tests
carried out with calves. The literature review is concerned with information about the
effects of probiotics on calves as well as their performance characteristics, health and the
ability of colonization of probiotic bacteria in their digestive tract.
The experimental part of the research is concerned with the TAK-98 strain of lactic acid
bacteria survival, and its study carried out among calves intestine tract registered by Bio-
Competence Centre of Healthy Dairy Products. In the experiment, probiotic treatment
was introduced by drenching calves from the second drench event. The L. plantarum E-
98 strain was given to calves in quantities of 1010 colony-forming units per day. The
probiotic bacteria investigated was previously mixed with a carrier substance, which
facilitated the preservation and dosing of bacteria.
In order to examine the survival ability of probiotic bacteria, samples of faeces from the
rectum of calves were collected. This procedure started on the second day of life of the
calves under test and continued through the third, fourth and fifth day of life – during
which time probiotics were fed to the calves. Three days after the test, new samples of
faeces were taken from the calves to determine whether the probiotic had colonized the
gastrointestinal tract of the calves, and also if it was viable after administration.
The results showed that the level of bacterium L. plantarum E-98 in the faeces of an
group of calves rose to a peak on the third day of the test. In the faeces of one of the test
calves, the bacteria investigated was no longer found on the fourth day of the test. The
reason for this could have been that the calf had not drunk any dairy products containing
probiotics on the second and fourth day. In the faeces of the other test calves the
concentration of the tested bacteria remained consistently high until the fifth day of the
test, when drenching the calves with probiotic bacterium finished.
As a conclusion, the results are in good accordance with the data found in the literature.
The strain of bacteria investigated, L. plantarum E-98, maintains viability in the
abomasum and is able to actively reproduce in the intestinal tract of calves, but will not
continue to survive there after the cessation of treatment. Further studies will show how
aggressive the strain of L. plantarum E-98 is against pathogenic bacteria.