Prisma kiirleidmine tahhümeetri eemaltjuhtimisel
dc.contributor.advisor | Jürgenson, Harli | |
dc.contributor.author | Nikolajev, Artjom | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-27T14:45:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-27T14:45:17Z | |
dc.date.defensed | 2021-06-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description | Bakalaureusetöö Geodeesia, kinnisvara- ja maakorralduse õppekaval | est |
dc.description.abstract | Tänapäeval on geodeetiliste tööde käigus mõõtmiste kiirus muutunud mitte vähem oluliseks kui mõõtmiste täpsus. Teiseks on tähtis võimalus mõõta üksinda. Tihtipeale juhtub selline olukord, kui geodeet või maamõõtja kulutavad palju aega prisma otsimisele, kui ühendus tahhümeetri ja prisma vahel kaob ära. Seega paljud geodeetiliste instrumentide potentsiaalsed ostjad pööravad just kiirustegurile tähelepanu. Uurimistöö eesmärk oli välja selgitada Topcon GT Series, Trimble S6 ja Leica TS16 tahhümeetrite prisma kiireleidmise võimalused. Uurimismetoodikaks olid praktilised mõõtmised, kus mõõdeti aega prismale lukustumiseni. Valitud testpunktid paiknesid tahhümeetrist erinevatel kaugustel: 2 m, 10m ja 25m. Igas punktis mõõdeti prisma otsimise ja automaatsuunamise kiirust kolm korda, sõltuvalt tahhümeetri okulaari pöördenurgast seisupunktis (0°, 90° ja 180°). Kiirust mõõdeti stopperiga ehk stopperi abil saavutati ajaandmed, mille põhjal selgus, mis tahhümeeter on kõige kiirem prisma leidmisel. Mõõtmised viidi läbi autori poolt Tallinnas ja Tartus. Testpunktid valiti lagedal ja tasapinnalisel alal, et takistavate objektide mõju vähendada. Mõõtmised tehti kahe erineva automatiseeritud tahhümeetriga: Topcon GT Series ja Trimble S6. Selgus, et tahhümeetril kulub prisma otsimisele GPS abil umbes 5-13 sekundit, sõltuvalt tahhümeetri asendist. | est |
dc.description.abstract | Today, in the course of geodetic work, the speed of measurements has become no less important than the accuracy of measurements. Most important is remote control. It often happens when a surveyor spends a lot of time searching for a prism when the connection between the total station and the prism is lost. In this way, the speed factor becomes very important when many potential buyers start searching for the most efficient instrument. The aim of the research was to find out the possibilities of prism quick finding by using Topcon GT Series, Trimble S6 and Leica TS16 total stations. The research methodology were test measurements where time was analized. Chosen test points were located at different distances from the total station: 2 m, 10 m and 25 m. Each point was measured three times, depending on the angle of rotation of the total station's eye (0 °, 90 ° and 180 °). At the same time, a stopwatch was used to fix the time of prism locking. Thanks to the data obtained from the stopwatch, it was possible to find out which total station and technology were the fastest in finding prism. Measurements were carreid out in Tallinn and Tartu and were performed by the author. Test points were selected in an open and flat area to reduce the effect of obstructions. The measurements described earlier were made by two different total stations: Topcon GT Series and Trimble S6. As results, tracking times from 5 to 13 seconds were achived. | eng |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10492/6764 | |
dc.publisher | Eesti Maaülikool | |
dc.subject | bakalaureusetööd | est |
dc.subject | geodeesia | est |
dc.subject | prisma | est |
dc.subject | kiirleidmine | est |
dc.subject | tahhümeeter | est |
dc.title | Prisma kiirleidmine tahhümeetri eemaltjuhtimisel | est |
dc.title.alternative | Quick prism finding by operating total station remotely | eng |
dc.type | Bachelor Thesis | eng |
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate | 08.09.2021 |