Kõlvikute ja maakatte tüüpide klassifikatsioonide suhe Eestis
Laen...
Kuupäev
2012
Kättesaadav alates
ainult raamatukogus, only in library
Autorid
Ajakirja pealkiri
Ajakirja ISSN
Köite pealkiri
Kirjastaja
Abstrakt
Antud teema kohta ei ole õnnestunud leida varasemaid uuringuid. Siiski on teema aktuaalne, sest maafondi kohta on erinevaid klassifikatsioone ning nende omavaheline suhe ei ole alati selge. Erinevate ülesannete lahendamisel tuleb kasutada erinevaid klassifikatsioone.
Käesoleva uurimustöö eesmärgiks on välja selgitada kahe erineva maafondi iseloomustava klassifikatsiooni (kõlvik ja maakattetüüp) omavaheline suhe, nende klassifikatsioonide erinevused ja ühisjooned.
Töö koostamiseks vajalikud andmed olid CORINE maakatte tüüpide ja ETAKi kõlvikute jaotuse klassifikatsiooniskeemid. Eesmärgid töö edukaks koostamiseks olid järgmised: selgitada teoreetilises plaanis klassifitseerimise olemust ja eesmärke, defineerida kõlviku ja maakatte mõiste sisu, koostada maatriks CORINE maakatte tüüpide ja ETAKi kõlvikut jaotuste võrdlemiseks ning analüüsida koostatud maatriksit.
Klassifikatsioonide võrdluse käigus selgus, et leidub küll sarnaseid ja mõningaid kattuvaid nähtusi, kuid klassifikatsioone ei ole võimalik üks ühele vastavusse viia. Seega on mõlemad klassifikatsioonid vajalikud ning üks ei saa asendada teist.
Kuna antud teema on huvitav, on võimalik bakalaureusetööd edasi arendada magistri tasemes.
It was not possible to find previous surveys on the topic of the study. However, the topic is relevant because there are different classifications of land reserve and the relationship between them is not always clear. To solve different tasks, is necessary to use different classifications. The aim of present survey is to clarify the relationship between two different classifications (land type and land cover) that characterise land reserve, similarities and differences of those classifications. Important data for the survey were the classification division schemes of CORINE land cover and ETAK land type. The objectives to do the work successfully were as following: Clarify the matter of classification and aims theoretically Define the concept of land type and land cover Construct a matrix to compare division of CORINE land cover types and land types and analyse constructed matrix Comparing classifications it was found out that there are some similar and coincidental phenomena but it is not possible to conform classifications one by one. For that reason both classifications are important and one of them cannot replace the other. As this topic is interesting, it is possible to develop this Bachelor’s thesis in the Master’s level.
It was not possible to find previous surveys on the topic of the study. However, the topic is relevant because there are different classifications of land reserve and the relationship between them is not always clear. To solve different tasks, is necessary to use different classifications. The aim of present survey is to clarify the relationship between two different classifications (land type and land cover) that characterise land reserve, similarities and differences of those classifications. Important data for the survey were the classification division schemes of CORINE land cover and ETAK land type. The objectives to do the work successfully were as following: Clarify the matter of classification and aims theoretically Define the concept of land type and land cover Construct a matrix to compare division of CORINE land cover types and land types and analyse constructed matrix Comparing classifications it was found out that there are some similar and coincidental phenomena but it is not possible to conform classifications one by one. For that reason both classifications are important and one of them cannot replace the other. As this topic is interesting, it is possible to develop this Bachelor’s thesis in the Master’s level.
Kirjeldus
Märksõnad
kõlvik, maakate, klassifitseerimine, Eesti, bakalaureusetööd