Andmebaasi logo
 

Comparison of two sowing systems for CTF using commercially available machinery

Lühendatud kirje lehekülg
dc.contributor.authorMacák, M.
dc.contributor.authorRataj, V.
dc.contributor.authorBarát, M.
dc.contributor.authorGalambošová, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T08:02:34Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T08:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionArticleeng
dc.description.abstractThe crop establishment belongs to crucial technology operations. The quality of sowing is the basis for obtaining efficiency of production. Controlled Traffic Farming (CTF) is a technology which prevents excessive soil compaction and minimizes compacted area to the smallest possible area of perman ent traffic lanes (PTL). There were two sowing systems compared, namely row and band sowing when growing winter barley. Sowing parameters as well as all other field operations were identical for both compared systems. Measurements were conducted at an expe rimental field on non - compacted and traffic lane areas where CTF system was introduced in 2009, with 64% of compacted and 36% of non - compacted soil. Six crop parameters were analysed. Generally, it can be concluded that the band sowing performed better in yield (by 9.3% in non - compacted area; by 3.8 % in traffic lane), ear number (by 5.2% in non - compacted area; by 10.1% in traffic lane) and grain number (by 6.3% in non - compacted area; by 8.1% in traffic lane) as well as crop height (by 6.6% in non - compacted area; and by 2.4% in traffic lane). The only parameter performing worse was TGW with decrease of 6.6% in non - compacted area and decrease 2.8% in traffic lane for band system. Differences in number of grain per ear were negligible.eng
dc.identifier.issn1406-894X
dc.identifier.publicationAgronomy Research, 2018, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 523-533eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/3880
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.060
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 by Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, incl. photocopying, electronic recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission from the Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestryeng
dc.subjectband sowingeng
dc.subjectdrilleng
dc.subjectCTFeng
dc.subjectoil compactioneng
dc.subjectcerealseng
dc.subjectarticleseng
dc.titleComparison of two sowing systems for CTF using commercially available machineryeng
dc.typeArticleeng

Failid

Originaal pakett

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 1 1
Pisipilt
Nimi:
Vol16No2_22.pdf
Suurus:
1.54 MB
Formaat:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Kirjeldus:
Article
Lae alla

Kollektsioonid

2018, Vol. 16, No. 2