Andmebaasi logo
 

Global patterns in the metacommunity structuring of lake macrophytes: regional variations and driving factors

dc.contributor.authorAlahuhta, Janne
dc.contributor.authorLindholm, Marja
dc.contributor.authorBove, Claudia P.
dc.contributor.authorChappuis, Eglantine
dc.contributor.authorClayton, John
dc.contributor.authorDe Winton, Mary
dc.contributor.authorFeldmann, Tõnu
dc.contributor.authorEcke, Frauke
dc.contributor.authorGacia, Esperança
dc.contributor.authorGrillas, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorHoyer, Mark V.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Lucinda B.
dc.contributor.authorKolada, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorKosten, Sarian
dc.contributor.authorLauridsen, Torben
dc.contributor.authorLukács, Balázs A.
dc.contributor.authorMjelde, Marit
dc.contributor.authorMormul, Roger P.
dc.contributor.authorRhazi, Laila
dc.contributor.authorRhazi, Mouhssine
dc.contributor.authorSass, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSøndergaard, Martin
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jun
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Jani
dc.contributor.departmentCentre for Limnology. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. Estonian University of Life Scienceseng
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T11:29:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T11:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractWe studied community–environment relationships of lake macrophytes at two metacommunity scales using data from 16 regions across the world. More specifically, we examined (a) whether the lake macrophyte communities respond similar to key local environmental factors, major climate variables and lake spatial locations in each of the regions (i.e., within-region approach) and (b) how well can explained variability in the community–environment relationships across multiple lake macrophyte metacommunities be accounted for by elevation range, spatial extent, latitude, longitude, and age of the oldest lake within each metacommunity (i.e., across-region approach). In the within-region approach, we employed partial redundancy analyses together with variation partitioning to investigate the relative importance of local variables, climate variables, and spatial location on lake macrophytes among the study regions. In the across-region approach, we used adjusted R2 values of the variation partitioning to model the community–environment relationships across multiple metacommunities using linear regression and commonality analysis. We found that niche filtering related to local lake-level environmental conditions was the dominant force structuring macrophytes within metacommunities. However, our results also revealed that elevation range associated with climate (increasing temperature amplitude affecting macrophytes) and spatial location (likely due to dispersal limitation) was important for macrophytes based on the findings of the across-metacommunities analysis. These findings suggest that different determinants influence macrophyte metacommunities within different regions, thus showing context dependency. Moreover, our study emphasized that the use of a single metacommunity scale gives incomplete information on the environmental features explaining variation in macrophyte communities.eng
dc.description.abstractOpen access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. JA appreciates financial support from the Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation. BAL was supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH, OTKA PD120775 Grant and by the Bolyai János Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. S.K. was supported by NWO Veni grant 86312012. Sampling of the coastal Brazilian lakes was financed by NWO grant W84-549; The National Geographic Society grant 7864-5; and CNPq grants 480122, 490409, 311427. We thank the SALGA team, especially Gissell Lacerot, Nestor Mazzeo, Vera Huszar, David da Motta Marques, and Erik Jeppesen for organizing and executing the SALGA field sampling campaign and Bruno Irgang† and Eduardo Alonso Paz for help with identification. We thank Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources for collecting the macrophyte data. We are especially grateful to Carol Reschke, University of Minnesota Duluth, for her work in combining and performing quality control for the Minnesota macrophyte data used in the analysis. This is contribution no. 607 of the Natural Resources Research Inst. of the Univ. of Minnesota Duluth. Provision of New Zealand macrophyte data was possible via NIWA SSIF funding.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. JA appreciates financial support from the Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation. BAL was supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH, OTKA PD120775 Grant and by the Bolyai János Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. S.K. was supported by NWO Veni grant 86312012. Sampling of the coastal Brazilian lakes was financed by NWO grant W84-549; The National Geographic Society grant 7864-5; and CNPq grants 480122, 490409, 311427. We thank the SALGA team, especially Gissell Lacerot, Nestor Mazzeo, Vera Huszar, David da Motta Marques, and Erik Jeppesen for organizing and executing the SALGA field sampling campaign and Bruno Irgang† and Eduardo Alonso Paz for help with identification. We thank Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources for collecting the macrophyte data. We are especially grateful to Carol Reschke, University of Minnesota Duluth, for her work in combining and performing quality control for the Minnesota macrophyte data used in the analysis. This is contribution no. 607 of the Natural Resources Research Inst. of the Univ. of Minnesota Duluth. Provision of New Zealand macrophyte data was possible via NIWA SSIF funding.eng
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939
dc.identifier.publicationOecologia (2018) 188:1167–1182eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/7799
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4294-0
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) ; openAccesseng
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectaquatic plantseng
dc.subjectbiogeographyeng
dc.subjectcommunity structureeng
dc.subjectelevation rangeeng
dc.subjectenvironmental filteringeng
dc.subjecthydrophyteseng
dc.subjectmetacommunity ecologyeng
dc.subjectspatial processeseng
dc.subjectspatial variationeng
dc.subjectarticleseng
dc.titleGlobal patterns in the metacommunity structuring of lake macrophytes: regional variations and driving factorseng
dc.typeArticleeng

Failid

Originaal pakett

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 1 1
Laen...
Pisipilt
Nimi:
1. Alahuhta, J, Global patterns .pdf
Suurus:
1.28 MB
Formaat:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Kirjeldus:
Article

Kollektsioonid