EMÜ loodusteaduslikud kogud

Selle valdkonna püsiv URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/3706

Sirvi

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 20 140

Ähijärv
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, 2025) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Mäemets, Helle (Leg.); Pork, Maia (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Kõvask, Viive (Det.); Pork, Maia (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Phytoplankton biomass, diversity and abundance in samples collected from Lake Ahijärv during the period 1952-2000.
Arbi
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, 2025) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Phytoplankton biomass, diversity and abundance in samples collected from Lake Arbi during the period 1975-1996.
Ermistu
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, 2025) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Timm, Henn (Leg.); Heinsalu, Atko (Leg.); Pork, Maia (Leg.); Mäemets, Aare (Leg.); Lepiksaar, Johannes (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Phytoplankton biomass, diversity and abundance in samples collected from Lake Ermistu during the period 1929-1995.
Jalase Bog
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, 2025) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Aalde, Raul (Leg.); Kübar, Kaidi (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Phytoplankton biomass, diversity and abundance in samples collected from Jalase Bog during the period 1991 and 1995.
Kilingi-Nõmme lakes
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, 2025) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Phytoplankton biomass, diversity and abundance in samples collected from Kilingi-Nõmme lakes during the period 1996-2004.
Lake Peipsi 1962 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1962) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Pork, Maia (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1963 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1963) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Kõvask, Viive (Det.); Pork, Maia (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1964 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1964) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1965 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1965) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1966 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1966) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1967 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1967) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1968 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1968) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1970 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1970) Timm, Tarmo (Leg.); Pork, Maia (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1971 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1971) Pihu, Ervin (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1974 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1974) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1975 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1975) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1978 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1978) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1979 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1979) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1980 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1980) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.
Lake Peipsi 1981 (Phytoplankton samples)
(1981) Laugaste, Reet (Leg.); Laugaste, Reet (Det.); Eesti Maaülikool. Loodusteaduslikud kogud
Method: Up to 1988 the samples were preserved with formaldehyde (not neutralised), and lots of samples were spoiled: sample sediment was flaked, stuck together, or rusty. By this reason, a number of results of countings are not representative.