Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZargar, M.
dc.contributor.authorPolityko, P.
dc.contributor.authorPakina, E.
dc.contributor.authorBayat, M.
dc.contributor.authorVandyshev, V.
dc.contributor.authorKavhiza, N.
dc.contributor.authorKiselev, E.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T10:24:23Z
dc.date.available2018-10-17T10:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.publicationAgronomy Research, 2018, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2254-2264eng
dc.identifier.issn1406-894X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/4503
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.204
dc.descriptionArticleeng
dc.description.abstractManaging farming inputs in wheat production technologies is an issue of paramount importance to attain optimum profitable production. To examine how varying the farming inputs affects the nutrients uptake and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and to determine the economic efficiency of various cultivation technologies, three-year field experiments were laid out at the Russian Research Institute of Agriculture, during the 2015–2017 growing seasons. Experiments were conducted once a year using randomized complete block arranged in a split plot experimental design with three replications, with the cultivation technology treatments (basic, intensive and high intensive technology) as the main plots, and spring wheat cultivars (Zelata, Lubova, Liza and Ester) as the sub-main plots. The highest grain yield (10.8 t ha-1), harvest index (42.9%), gluten content (39.45%) and gluten index (71.17%) observed for spring wheat cultivar Lubova with the moderate application of farming inputs as an intensive cultivation technology. Highest protein content (18.02%) was attained for both intensive and high intensive cultivation technology with the cultivar Lubova, and the highest 1,000 grains weight (46.32 g) was recorded by cultivar Lubova in basic cultivation technology. Applying moderate amount of inputs as an intensive cultivation technology resulted in highest wheat yield and net income.eng
dc.rights.urihttps://doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.204
dc.subjectspring wheateng
dc.subjectcultivarseng
dc.subjectcultivation technologyeng
dc.subjecteconomic efficiencyeng
dc.subjectarticleseng
dc.titleProductivity, quality and economics of four spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars as affected by three cultivation technologieseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 by Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, incl. photocopying, electronic recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission from the Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
All items in EMU digital archive DSpace are protected by original copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.