Näita lihtsat nimetuse kirjet

dc.contributor.authorKrištof, K.
dc.contributor.authorGaduš, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-14T08:30:47Z
dc.date.available2018-05-14T08:30:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.publicationAgronomy Research, 2018, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 769-783eng
dc.identifier.issn1406-894X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10492/4009
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.146
dc.descriptionArticleeng
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to confirm the suitability of alternative input substrates for production of biogas in order to decrese the need of utilization of high quality maize silage. All of the experiments were conducted by employement of wet fermentation process in mesophilic conditions (temperature in fermentor 40 ± 1 °C ) in experimental fermentor with volume 5 m 3 . The exp eriments were realised in operating conditions of biogas station designed for utilization of agricultural biowaste. The experiments were divided into two alternatives (I and II cycle) and one controle input substates. In the first alternative (I cycle) was daily dosage formed by 33 kg of Amaranth and 250 L of controle manure mixture. In this cycle, more than 3 – times greater specific production of biogas was observed with average methan content 63.9% in comparison with controle manure mixture (80 : 20%, liquid manure and manure). In the second alternative (II cycle) was daily dosage formed by 19.5 kg of sugar beer cuts, 3.3 kg of maize silage, 1.9 kg of oil - seed rape moldings, 2.5 kg of glycerine and 250 L of controle manure mixture. In this cycle, more than 5. 9 – times greater specific production of biogas was observed. The decrease in averare methan content 55.1% however also decrease in average content of hydrogen sulphide (128 ppm ) was observed as well. An unquestionable advantage for both tested alternative m ixed substrates was increase in biogas production and its quality in comparison with control substrate based on manure. At the basis of these findings can be concluded that both tested alternative input substrate mixtures are suitable as co – fermentation su bstances with great potential to increase the biogas production and its quality in case of wet fermentation processes.eng
dc.subjectbiogaseng
dc.subjectco-fermentationeng
dc.subjectco-substrateseng
dc.subjectanaerobic digestioneng
dc.subjectwet fermentationeng
dc.subjectarticleseng
dc.titleEffect of alternative sources of input substrates on biogas production and its quality from anaerobic digestion by using wet fermentationeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 by Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, incl. photocopying, electronic recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission from the Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Agriculture, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestryeng


Failid selles nimetuses

Thumbnail

Nimetus asub järgmis(t)es kollektsiooni(de)s:

Näita lihtsat nimetuse kirjet


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Kõik kirjed Eesti Maaülikooli digitaalarhiivis DSpace on autoriõigusega kaitstud, kui ei ole teisiti märgitud.